<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
      <title>Distribution Specific - forum.slicehost.com</title>
      <link>http://forum.slicehost.com/index.php?p=/categories/distribution-specific/feed.rss</link>
      <pubDate>Sun, 19 May 13 22:11:22 -0400</pubDate>
         <description>Distribution Specific - forum.slicehost.com</description>
   <language>en-CA</language>
   <atom:link href="/index.php?p=/discussions/feed.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
   <item>
      <title>Why does CentOS yum pull both x86_64 and i386 on slice?</title>
      <link>http://forum.slicehost.com/index.php?p=/discussion/2274/why-does-centos-yum-pull-both-x86_64-and-i386-on-slice</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2008 09:37:42 -0400</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Igor</dc:creator>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">2274@/index.php?p=/discussions</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[Hi there - subject says it all really:<br />
<br />
=============================================================================<br />
 Package                 Arch       Version          Repository        Size <br />
=============================================================================<br />
Installing:<br />
 openssl-devel           x86_64     0.9.8b-10.el5    base              1.8 M<br />
 openssl-devel           i386       0.9.8b-10.el5    base              1.8 M<br />
<br />
Is that necessary? How do I stop it if not?<br />
<br />
Cheers,<br />
Igor]]></description>
   </item>
   <item>
      <title>Slackware or slackware64</title>
      <link>http://forum.slicehost.com/index.php?p=/discussion/5106/slackware-or-slackware64</link>
      <pubDate>Sat, 29 Jan 2011 05:04:27 -0500</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>netrixtardis</dc:creator>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">5106@/index.php?p=/discussions</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[is there a chance slicehost will expand it&#039;s list of distro?  would be nice to have other choices such as slackware/slackware64.<br />
<br />
Also what has become of the pv-grub beta?  when will this feature come out of the beta stages - would be nice to be able to run own kernel instead of the Xen dom0&#039;s kernel.]]></description>
   </item>
   <item>
      <title>User Defined Functions in mySQL for Ubuntu</title>
      <link>http://forum.slicehost.com/index.php?p=/discussion/5107/user-defined-functions-in-mysql-for-ubuntu</link>
      <pubDate>Sun, 30 Jan 2011 17:42:41 -0500</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>ASK</dc:creator>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">5107@/index.php?p=/discussions</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[I'm trying to set up some User Defined Functions in mySQL so I can use regular expressions in mySQL queries. I found this page  <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.mysqludf.org/lib_mysqludf_preg/">http://www.mysqludf.org/lib_mysqludf_preg/</a> that explains how to set it up.<br /><br />It turned out that all the necessary libraries were already installed on my Karmic slice. However, when I try to run the SQL query<br />CREATE FUNCTION preg_capture RETURNS STRING SONAME  'lib_mysqludf_preg.so'<br />I get this error:<br />Can't open shared library 'lib_mysqludf_preg.so' (errno: 22 /usr/lib/mysql/plugin/lib_mysqludf_preg.so: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory)<br /><br />Indeed, that directory doesn't even exist, and I can't find lib_mysqludf_preg.so anywhere. I believe I could compile it manually, but I'd rather know why it's not working right now if apt tells I have the right libraries installed.]]></description>
   </item>
   <item>
      <title>How should I go about upgrading my slice from Ubuntu Intrepid to Lucid?</title>
      <link>http://forum.slicehost.com/index.php?p=/discussion/5084/how-should-i-go-about-upgrading-my-slice-from-ubuntu-intrepid-to-lucid</link>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Jan 2011 11:26:02 -0500</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>egmanoj</dc:creator>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">5084@/index.php?p=/discussions</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[I have a 256 MB slice running Ubuntu Intrepid. I&#039;d like to upgrade the distro to Lucid Lynx. How should I go about it? <br />
<br />
According to this &quot;blog entry&quot;:http://www.slicehost.com/articles/2009/10/28/ubuntu-karmic-koala-note SH discourages upgrading from the command line. The preferred alternative seems to be backing up everything followed by rebuilding the slice from the control panel. <br />
<br />
I understand that rebuilding the slice would require me to configure everything again. I&#039;d like to avoid this. <br />
<br />
PS: just to be clear, this is what I mean by upgrading from the command line:<br />
<br />
@sudo apt-get update<br />
sudo apt-get install update-manager-core<br />
sudo do-release-upgrade@<br />
<br />
PPS: This is the output of `lsb_release -a`<br />
<br />
@~: sudo lsb_release -a<br />
No LSB modules are available.<br />
Distributor ID:	Ubuntu<br />
Description:	Ubuntu 8.10<br />
Release:	8.10<br />
Codename:	intrepid@]]></description>
   </item>
   <item>
      <title>Deployed Grails app won&#039;t start</title>
      <link>http://forum.slicehost.com/index.php?p=/discussion/4895/deployed-grails-app-wont-start</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Aug 2010 03:37:34 -0400</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>geezenslaw</dc:creator>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">4895@/index.php?p=/discussions</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[Hello slicers, I have the following curious situation: I have deployed my Ubuntu/Grails/Tomcat/MySQL app on my slicehost slice and on a conventional colo server equipped with: CentOS/Tomcat/MySQL. In both cases the app fails to start according to the Tomcat manager. There is nothing in the MySQL or Tomcat logs to brag about. Rants, raves and ideas welcomed. :-David.]]></description>
   </item>
   <item>
      <title>Ubuntu slice karmic to lucid</title>
      <link>http://forum.slicehost.com/index.php?p=/discussion/4868/ubuntu-slice-karmic-to-lucid</link>
      <pubDate>Sat, 10 Jul 2010 13:39:33 -0400</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>wascallywabbit</dc:creator>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">4868@/index.php?p=/discussions</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[I was just wondering if I can upgrade my slice running Ubuntu Karmic to Lucid without damaging the slice. I have already installed the latest available kernel through the slice control panel.<br />
<br />
Thanks]]></description>
   </item>
   <item>
      <title>Ubuntu repository on internal network?</title>
      <link>http://forum.slicehost.com/index.php?p=/discussion/4776/ubuntu-repository-on-internal-network</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 May 2010 22:43:05 -0400</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>craSH</dc:creator>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">4776@/index.php?p=/discussions</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[Is there a local Ubuntu repository available for use via the Internal network? It would be great if we could do package management without eating through the external bandwidth.<br />
<br />
If not, are there any plans for this or has it been decided not to offer such a service?<br />
<br />
I saw there was a similar thread about Fedora yum repositories with the &quot;No&quot; answer, but I figured it doesn&#039;t hurt to ask :) Thanks!]]></description>
   </item>
   <item>
      <title>Will upgrade to Lucid Lynx LTS max out the memory on a 256MB Slice?</title>
      <link>http://forum.slicehost.com/index.php?p=/discussion/4750/will-upgrade-to-lucid-lynx-lts-max-out-the-memory-on-a-256mb-slice</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 May 2010 22:25:55 -0400</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>austin</dc:creator>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">4750@/index.php?p=/discussions</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[The <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.ubuntu.com/getubuntu/releasenotes/1004">Ubuntu 10.04 LTS Release Notes</a> say, <em>The minimum memory requirement for Ubuntu 10.04 LTS is 256 MB of memory</em>. (The Ubuntu Hardy Heron release notes say that its minimum  memory requirement is only 128MB.)<br /><br />Does that mean that Lucid Lynx would be a poor fit on a 256MB Slice?<br /><br />The instructions <a rel="nofollow" href="http://wiki.slicehost.com/doku.php?id=upgrade_ubuntu-server_lts_to_lts">Upgrade Ubuntu-server LTS to LTS</a> on the Slicehost wiki, offer no advice on this matter.<br /><br />My 256MB Slice runs Ubuntu Hardy Heron LTS. I'd like to upgrade to Ubuntu Lucid Lynx LTS.<br /><br />I would appreciate any advice on this subject. <br /><br />Thanks! <br /><br />A U S T I N .]]></description>
   </item>
   <item>
      <title>Upgrading from 8.04  LTS to 10.04 LTS</title>
      <link>http://forum.slicehost.com/index.php?p=/discussion/4743/upgrading-from-8-04-lts-to-10-04-lts</link>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 May 2010 13:44:18 -0400</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>tazz_ben</dc:creator>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">4743@/index.php?p=/discussions</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[I&#039;m thinking about attempting a distribution upgrade (with a good backup first) before going the route of rebuilding the slice from scratch and transferring the data.  I&#039;m curios of any one has attempted this yet and if they ran into big problems.]]></description>
   </item>
   <item>
      <title>Centos 5.4 headless dvi for virtualbox</title>
      <link>http://forum.slicehost.com/index.php?p=/discussion/4721/centos-5-4-headless-dvi-for-virtualbox</link>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 May 2010 14:02:08 -0400</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>kcunning</dc:creator>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">4721@/index.php?p=/discussions</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[I&#039;m developing on a Centos 5 slice, and I&#039;d like to set up a Virtualbox image on my local for rpm creation and testing. However, I can&#039;t seem to find a headless Centos 5 disk image anywhere. Can anyone point me to where I might be able to download a headless distro for Centos?]]></description>
   </item>
   <item>
      <title>help me width server</title>
      <link>http://forum.slicehost.com/index.php?p=/discussion/4675/help-me-width-server</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Apr 2010 17:44:09 -0400</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>aseksas</dc:creator>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">4675@/index.php?p=/discussions</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[Hello, the server breaks it reached 201 to 205 players. <br />
certainly not the fault of the hosting. Dedicated server is a stand LRG, GW, CS. Gw charge (1 percent) (cs starting 1proc) (LRG take 90 per cent) in their cores. There are 2 core, so that should hold about 400 people.<br />
<br />
Dedicated as follows:<br />
CPU: Intel C2Q 2.4 GHz<br />
RAM: 8GB DDR2<br />
RAID: RAID0, 1<br />
Flow: Unlimited | 10TB<br />
Line: 10Mbit / s | 100Mbit / s<br />
<br />
what&#039;s the problem of what breaks? some errors with the following:<br />
CODE<br />
Apr 18 17:30:26 lrg2 sshd [17931]: pam_env (sshd: setcred): Unable to open env file: / etc / default / locale: from Mediaeval directory<br />
Apr 18 17:30:26 lrg2 sshd [17931]: pam_unix (sshd: session): session opened for user root by (uid = 0)<br />
Apr 18 17:30:26 lrg2 sshd [17931]: subsystem request for sftp<br />
Apr 18 17:30:26 lrg2 sshd [17933]: pam_env (sshd: setcred): Unable to open env file: / etc / default / locale: from Mediaeval directory<br />
<br />
Apr 18 17:30:24 lrg2 sshd [17931]: error writing / proc / self / oom_adj: Operation not permitted<br />
<br />
samp03svr: AMX / amxfile.c: 222: fputs_cell: Assertion `fp! = ((void *) 0) &#039;failed.<br />
<br />
So what could be a problem.]]></description>
   </item>
   <item>
      <title>Ubuntu 10.04 Lucid Lynx NX remote desktop version...</title>
      <link>http://forum.slicehost.com/index.php?p=/discussion/4644/ubuntu-10-04-lucid-lynx-nx-remote-desktop-version-</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Apr 2010 02:44:47 -0400</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Ouroboros</dc:creator>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">4644@/index.php?p=/discussions</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[10.04 will be out soon, and an important new feature is the EC2 cloud specific version with NX remote desktop capability built-in. Will Slicehost be offering a prebuilt remote desktop slice with NX up and running, in addition to the usual ubuntu server slice?]]></description>
   </item>
   <item>
      <title>CentOS 5.4 and PHP 5.3.2</title>
      <link>http://forum.slicehost.com/index.php?p=/discussion/4603/centos-5-4-and-php-5-3-2</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 06:57:00 -0400</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>wetnun</dc:creator>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">4603@/index.php?p=/discussions</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[So I need PHP 5.3.2 for my slice.  For those of you that have needed you probably found that this is a pain for packages.  As a result of most of the google attempts I just build my own packages.  You can find them here: http://pe-ell.net/rpms.html<br />
<br />
And here&#039;s how I installed them:<br />
<br />
cd /etc<br />
<br />
cp php.ini php.ini.5.1.6<br />
<br />
cd httpd/conf.d/<br />
<br />
cp php.conf php.conf.5.1.6<br />
<br />
cd /path/to/rpms/you/downloaded/<br />
<br />
rpm -qa | grep php | xargs rpm -e --nodeps<br />
<br />
rpm -Uvh php-5.3.2-1.x86_64.rpm php-cli-5.3.2-1.x86_64.rpm php-common-5.3.2-1.x86_64.rpm<br />
<br />
rpm -Uvh php-bcmath-5.3.2-1.x86_64.rpm php-dba-5.3.2-1.x86_64.rpm php-debuginfo-5.3.2-1.x86_64.rpm php-gd-5.3.2-1.x86_64.rpm php-imap-5.3.2-1.x86_64.rpm php-intl-5.3.2-1.x86_64.rpm php-ldap-5.3.2-1.x86_64.rpm php-mbstring-5.3.2-1.x86_64.rpm php-mcrypt-5.3.2-1.x86_64.rpm php-mysql-5.3.2-1.x86_64.rpm php-pdo-5.3.2-1.x86_64.rpm<br />
<br />
rpm -Uvh php-pear-1.9.0-1.noarch.rpm php-process-5.3.2-1.x86_64.rpm php-pspell-5.3.2-1.x86_64.rpm php-recode-5.3.2-1.x86_64.rpm php-snmp-5.3.2-1.x86_64.rpm php-soap-5.3.2-1.x86_64.rpm php-tidy-5.3.2-1.x86_64.rpm php-xml-5.3.2-1.x86_64.rpm php-xmlrpc-5.3.2-1.x86_64.rpm php-zts-5.3.2-1.x86_64.rpm<br />
<br />
service httpd restart<br />
<br />
Surprising everything worked great out the door afterwards.  Tested all of my php sites and they worked fine.  I need to change my logging level though since I&#039;m getting lots of PHP Deprecated and PHP Warning due to the upgrade.  Hopefully this will help others.<br />
<br />
Also make sure you have date.timezone set in your php.ini and you should probably change your error_reporting to something like this: E_ALL &amp; ~E_DEPRECATED &amp; ~E_USER_DEPRECATED &amp; ~E_NOTICE]]></description>
   </item>
   <item>
      <title>Vyatta?</title>
      <link>http://forum.slicehost.com/index.php?p=/discussion/4503/vyatta</link>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 04:53:46 -0500</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Ouroboros</dc:creator>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">4503@/index.php?p=/discussions</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[I was wondering how exactly one goes about proposing a distro for inclusion?<br />
<br />
I&#039;ve been tinkering around with Vyatta, a debian based router distro, and I wanted to have a slice for testing stuff. Only real problem is that the Vyatta distro has a tweaked kernel and is 32bit so ordinarily that is a immediate no here, but if the February news included 32bit OS support, fun times can be had. <br />
<br />
http://www.vyatta.org<br />
current stable is V5, VC6 is in late alpha now with xen images available.]]></description>
   </item>
   <item>
      <title>Can I do-release-upgrade safely on a VPS?</title>
      <link>http://forum.slicehost.com/index.php?p=/discussion/4365/can-i-do-release-upgrade-safely-on-a-vps</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2009 04:14:44 -0500</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>delayedinsanity</dc:creator>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">4365@/index.php?p=/discussions</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[I built my slice before Karmic was out, and it&#039;s running Ubuntu 9.04 Jaunty. I would like to upgrade the core to 9.10 (Karmic) and since I can&#039;t do a slice rebuild without destroying all my data (even though it&#039;s tempting to back it up and do a clean reinstall, because I&#039;m sure I left some junk in there from learning postfix and a few others), I&#039;m wondering how safe it is to run do-release-upgrade on a VPS?<br />
<br />
&quot;This session appears to be running under ssh. It is not recommended<br />
to perform an upgrade over ssh at present, because in case of failure<br />
it is harder to recover.&quot;<br />
<br />
That gave me caution, even though I know the risk and honestly I&#039;m not worried about personally making a mistake... Has anybody run this successfully themselves?]]></description>
   </item>
   <item>
      <title>hvc0 missing?</title>
      <link>http://forum.slicehost.com/index.php?p=/discussion/4359/hvc0-missing</link>
      <pubDate>Sat, 05 Dec 2009 04:17:14 -0500</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>suetanvil</dc:creator>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">4359@/index.php?p=/discussions</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[I&#039;ve been running Centos 5.4 for the last few days.  It works fine except for one thing.  I keep getting this:<br />
<br />
    Dec  5 04:11:47 hostname /sbin/mingetty[4725]: hvc0: No such file or directory<br />
<br />
in my system log.  If I remove the line from inittab that tries to open it (&quot;8:2345:respawn:/sbin/mingetty hvc0&quot;) the errors go away but so does the web-based console.<br />
<br />
I&#039;ve tried creating the /dev/hvc0 with<br />
<br />
    mknod /dev/hvc0 c 229 0<br />
<br />
and that doesn&#039;t work either, although it does give me a different error message.<br />
<br />
Anyone know how to fix this?  I&#039;m really not liking how this pollutes my system log.]]></description>
   </item>
   <item>
      <title>Fedora 12</title>
      <link>http://forum.slicehost.com/index.php?p=/discussion/4315/fedora-12</link>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 15:30:46 -0500</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>esm</dc:creator>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">4315@/index.php?p=/discussions</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[Has anyone upgraded to F12 (via rawhide) yet? Now that there's a relatively recent kernel available, it looks more promising to take a stab at it (at least in a controlled test), and release is next week, meaning you're not going to see much repository churn at this point.<br /><br />(I've had it running on my laptop for a month or so now, and on physical server hardware in my home office for about a week, but we all know that means very little when running under Xen. ;-) The last-minute changes I've seen coming through have been mostly desktop-related anyway, as usual. This morning, it looks like the final fedora-release RPM was pushed out, so updating today should basically give you F12, barring some crazy unforeseen issue.)]]></description>
   </item>
   <item>
      <title>Gentoo new version</title>
      <link>http://forum.slicehost.com/index.php?p=/discussion/4313/gentoo-new-version</link>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 14:27:29 -0500</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Xain</dc:creator>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">4313@/index.php?p=/discussions</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[Gentoo 10 is out a couple of month ago. Why we use the 2008 version?]]></description>
   </item>
   <item>
      <title>Upgrading ubuntu slice from hardy to ...</title>
      <link>http://forum.slicehost.com/index.php?p=/discussion/4300/upgrading-ubuntu-slice-from-hardy-to-</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 05:14:12 -0500</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>ae</dc:creator>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">4300@/index.php?p=/discussions</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[Upgrading ubuntu desktops between versions is problematic and I have always reinstalled afresh (with home being on a different partition to make life easier.<br />
<br />
I have only ever upgraded one ubuntu server which was dapper. The process was messy and not something I want to do with my production slices. <br />
<br />
So my question is - does anyone have any advice or stories around upgrading ubuntu server? Is it safe? Problems encountered?<br />
<br />
Cheers<br />
<br />
Andrew]]></description>
   </item>
   <item>
      <title>CentOS 5.4 is out!</title>
      <link>http://forum.slicehost.com/index.php?p=/discussion/4236/centos-5-4-is-out</link>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 18:04:33 -0400</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>jwilhelm</dc:creator>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">4236@/index.php?p=/discussions</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>CentOS 5.4 was officially released yesterday (Oct 21, 2009) and is available as a full download, or as an upgrade via yum. Release notes can be found here: <a rel="nofollow" href="http://wiki.centos.org/Manuals/ReleaseNotes/CentOS5.4">http://wiki.centos.org/Manuals/ReleaseNotes/CentOS5.4</a>.</p>

<p>My personal experience so far is good; I have upgraded all 3 of my slices and have not yet seen any issues. However, I can't guarantee that you will experience the same! Be sure to read the release notes to see what's changed before charging gung-ho into an upgrade!</p>
]]></description>
   </item>
   <item>
      <title>Jaunty slice has openssh-server marked for deletion</title>
      <link>http://forum.slicehost.com/index.php?p=/discussion/3803/jaunty-slice-has-openssh-server-marked-for-deletion</link>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 06:33:21 -0400</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>rbiffl</dc:creator>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">3803@/index.php?p=/discussions</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[When I build a new Ubuntu 9.04 slice, log in to the slice as root, and run aptitude, it shows openssh-server as being marked for deletion. Is that a bug on the slice image?]]></description>
   </item>
   <item>
      <title>Arch Linux 2008.06 Released</title>
      <link>http://forum.slicehost.com/index.php?p=/discussion/1993/arch-linux-2008-06-released</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 13:46:22 -0400</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>rob</dc:creator>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">1993@/index.php?p=/discussions</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[Looks like 2008.06 was released yesterday.<br />
<br />
Will there be updated images for these as well?<br />
<br />
http://archlinux.org/<br />
ftp://mirror.cs.vt.edu/pub/ArchLinux/iso/2008.06/ (direct link)]]></description>
   </item>
   <item>
      <title>CentOS 5.3, timezones, Java - read if you have time specific java apps</title>
      <link>http://forum.slicehost.com/index.php?p=/discussion/3670/centos-5-3-timezones-java-read-if-you-have-time-specific-java-apps</link>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 20:09:32 -0400</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>pgson</dc:creator>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">3670@/index.php?p=/discussions</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[We had a minor issue here with Java on our CentOS 5.3 slices compared to our 5.2 slices. <br /><br />We have our timezone changed on our slice via /etc/localtime, however on our 5.3 slices the output from java (see Test class below) would show up different:<br /><br />5.2<br />Mountain Standard Time<br />America/Phoenix<br />1242933746233<br />2009-05-21 12:22:26.233<br /><br />5.3<br />Coordinated Universal Time<br />Etc/UTC<br />1242934107902<br />2009-05-21 19:28:27.902<br /><br />This is a problem since it effected some time sensitive stuff in our java apps. However it is an known bug and there is an easy fix... <br /><br /><a rel="nofollow" href="https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489586" target="_blank">https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489586</a><br /><br />The 5.3 slices have the /etc/sysconfig/clock file while the 5.2 slices do not, just remove that file and the java picks up on it right away (you may need to reboot your java apps to pick up this change, I can't verify if this is necessary or not)<br /><br />Just a little fyi<br /><br />-Paul<br /><br /><pre><br />=========================<br />Java Test Class<br />=========================<br />import java.sql.Timestamp;<br />import java.util.Calendar;<br />import java.util.TimeZone;<br /><br />public class Test{<br /><br />        public static void main(String [ ] args){<br /> TimeZone tz = Calendar.getInstance().getTimeZone();<br /> System.out.println(tz.getDisplayName());<br /> System.out.println(tz.getID());<br />                System.out.println(System.currentTimeMillis());<br />                System.out.println(new Timestamp(System.currentTimeMillis()));<br />        }<br />}<br /></pre>]]></description>
   </item>
   <item>
      <title>Are openSUSE slices in the plans?</title>
      <link>http://forum.slicehost.com/index.php?p=/discussion/1702/are-opensuse-slices-in-the-plans</link>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 01:26:15 -0400</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Ricardo</dc:creator>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">1702@/index.php?p=/discussions</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[Hi all!<br />
<br />
I&#039;m a (happy) Slicehost customer. I think that I started with a CentOS 4.3 slice and then moved on to my current slice with CentOS 5.<br />
<br />
Although I&#039;m NOT thinking of changing of distribution (&quot;distro&quot;) right now, I&#039;m wondering if Slicehost is considering adding openSUSE - http://en.opensuse.org/ - to the list of available distros (namely, the last stable version that is openSUSE 10.3)<br />
<br />
Some arguments that I think may be relevant to add openSUSE slices:<br />
<br />
- It&#039;s a community project (although it is sponsored by Novell)<br />
<br />
-It&#039;s free (as in &quot;free beer&quot;) and free (as in &quot;free speech&quot;): according to http://en.opensuse.org/Download it contains only open source components, but an &quot;Add On CD&quot; is also available with some proprietary software (e.g: Sun Java Runtime Environment) <br />
<br />
- It has a 64-bit version <br />
<br />
- Like other distros, you may install it as a &quot;text-only&quot; operating system (like other slices are)<br />
<br />
- Matter of opinion: it has a nice setup tool (yast)<br />
<br />
- There are good online software &quot;package repositories&quot; - http://en.opensuse.org/Package_Repositories - that may also be set up in yast<br />
<br />
- The competition (*cof* Linode *cof*) offers it  ;-)<br />
<br />
<br />
So, is openSUSE being considered for inclusion to the list of available distributions for slices at Slicehost? Or are there any reasons to NOT include it?]]></description>
   </item>
   <item>
      <title>After Ubuntu Gutsy to Hardy Upgrade - some packages held back</title>
      <link>http://forum.slicehost.com/index.php?p=/discussion/3564/after-ubuntu-gutsy-to-hardy-upgrade-some-packages-held-back</link>
      <pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2009 23:43:05 -0400</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>saschwarz</dc:creator>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">3564@/index.php?p=/discussions</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[Hi,<br />
I just upgraded my slice from gutsy to hardy and after the reboot I ran sudo apt-get upgrade and get:<br />
<br />
Reading package lists... Done<br />
Building dependency tree       <br />
Reading state information... Done<br />
Reading extended state information      <br />
Initializing package states... Done<br />
Building tag database... Done      <br />
The following packages have been automatically kept back:<br />
  bind9-host g++ gcc libbind9-30 libisccc30 libisccfg30 libsvn1 <br />
  openssh-client php5-common <br />
The following packages have been kept back:<br />
  dnsutils libapache2-mod-php5 netcat openssh-server php5 php5-cli <br />
  php5-curl php5-dev php5-gd php5-imagick php5-mhash php5-mysql php5-pspell <br />
  php5-snmp php5-sqlite php5-xmlrpc php5-xsl python-setuptools sasl2-bin <br />
  subversion <br />
0 packages upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 29 not upgraded.<br />
Need to get 0B of archives. After unpacking 0B will be used.<br />
Reading package lists... Done<br />
Building dependency tree       <br />
Reading state information... Done<br />
Reading extended state information      <br />
Initializing package states... Done<br />
Building tag database... Done <br />
<br />
I didn&#039;t see this on my home machine when I upgraded it ages ago and was wondering why packages might be held back and if I should take some action?<br />
<br />
Thank you,<br />
Steve]]></description>
   </item>
   <item>
      <title>TrixBox?</title>
      <link>http://forum.slicehost.com/index.php?p=/discussion/3472/trixbox</link>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 21:40:12 -0400</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>jonathan0397</dc:creator>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">3472@/index.php?p=/discussions</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[I run a small PBX and i noticed that a few others here have also setup asterisk on their slices.<br />
<br />
Would it be possible to have a default install of trixbox made available to users? and a slice that already has ZAP supported?<br />
<br />
<br />
Thanks<br />
JC]]></description>
   </item>
   <item>
      <title>CentOS kernel updates?</title>
      <link>http://forum.slicehost.com/index.php?p=/discussion/3393/centos-kernel-updates</link>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2009 16:16:07 -0400</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>jwilhelm</dc:creator>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">3393@/index.php?p=/discussions</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[While I understand that Slicehost rolls their own kernels, there was a recent security update to the RHEL and CentOS kernels, detailed here: https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2009-0326.html<br />
<br />
Are the patches used in this update applicable to the kernel that Slicehost is providing? If so, when can us CentOS users expect an updated kernel... and more importantly, how would we know that one was available and where might we find it? (A Slicehost yum repo would be excellent! *hint hint*)]]></description>
   </item>
   <item>
      <title>How can I create a Debian etch slice now that slicehost has removed the option?</title>
      <link>http://forum.slicehost.com/index.php?p=/discussion/3239/how-can-i-create-a-debian-etch-slice-now-that-slicehost-has-removed-the-option</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2009 22:55:31 -0400</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>davel</dc:creator>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">3239@/index.php?p=/discussions</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[It&#039;s great that Slicehost was quick to support Debian lenny, but I&#039;m starting a production service that is built on etch.<br />
Slicehost dropped etch at the same time they added lenny, so I&#039;m stuck. I don&#039;t even have any existent etch machines to clone.<br />
<br />
Is it possible to downgrade a new lenny instance to etch?<br />
<br />
Am I the only one who laments Slicehost&#039;s retirement of etch so quickly, and with no warning?<br />
<br />
Thanks!]]></description>
   </item>
   <item>
      <title>CentOS - lvm2 needed?</title>
      <link>http://forum.slicehost.com/index.php?p=/discussion/3039/centos-lvm2-needed</link>
      <pubDate>Sat, 31 Jan 2009 03:15:19 -0500</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>kkeane</dc:creator>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">3039@/index.php?p=/discussions</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[I noticed that my Centos slice has lvm2 installed, and tries to start lvm2-monitor on startup. I&#039;m not using lvm on my slice, so I&#039;m wondering if it is that needed, or is it safe to uninstall?<br />
<br />
Thanks!]]></description>
   </item>
   <item>
      <title>Debian xen kernel upgrade</title>
      <link>http://forum.slicehost.com/index.php?p=/discussion/3093/debian-xen-kernel-upgrade</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 07:35:45 -0500</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>carboncopy</dc:creator>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">3093@/index.php?p=/discussions</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[I am a newbie in xen system.<br />
<br />
Why is the kernel for my xen host still version 2.6.18? Where else Debian have already release version 2.6.18.6.<br />
<br />
uname -r <br />
2.6.18-xen<br />
<br />
I have been diligently apt-get update and upgrade/dist-upgrade all this while.<br />
<br />
The last reboot for a slice of mine is was 72 days ago.<br />
<br />
(Lazy) Question : Does xen take on the host kernel?<br />
<br />
Question 2 : If xen does not take on the host kernel, how do I upgrade my kernel on slicehost?<br />
<br />
Thank you]]></description>
   </item>
   </channel>
</rss>